Pacific Mills v. Farish
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
In Efror to the District Court of the United States for the District of New Hampshire; Edgar Aldrich, Judge. Action by James A. Farish against the Pacific Mills. Judgment for the plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Per curiam
This is a writ of error bringing up on exceptions a case tried before the court and jury for the district of New Hampshire on issues arising in New Hampshire. The plaintiff in error waives its exceptions and its writ of error unless wé have jurisdiction to direct a final judgment ’in the District Court in its favor if the exceptions, or any of them, are maintained.
The practice of judgment non obstante veredicto does not prevail *449in the federal courts, as has been decided in several cases, the last of which is Young v. Central R. Co., 232 U. S. 602, 34 Sup. Ct. 451, 58 L. Ed. -. It might be…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Young v. Central R. Co. of NJSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pellerin v. International Cotton MillsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1918