Legal Opinion
Bank of Toronto v. Lengkeek
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 15, 1989No. 15786, 15802, 15932 and 16105PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Justice.
We have before us three cases which have been consolidated on appeal. The complexities of the facts and legal issues presented do not lend themselves to a concise and meaningful introductory paragraph. However, an understanding of the factual background in these cases is necessary in order to appreciate and properly analyze this “can of worms” which we must confront.
*273FACTS
One of the cases was previously before us. In Bank of Toronto v. Lengkeek, 397 N.W.2d 662 (S.D.1986) (Lengkeek I), we affirmed a declaratory judgment and a summary judgment but remanded to the trial court with…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Black Hills Jewelry Manufacturing Co. v. Felco Jewel Industries, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- Baliles v. Cities Service Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1979
- Golden v. Oahe Enterprises, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- Boswell v. LyonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Flack v. LasterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Darrow v. SchumacherSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Production Credit Ass'n of the Midlands v. WynneSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Anderson v. AesophSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Kroeplin Farms General Partnership v. Heartland Crop Insurance, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- State v. Van BuskirkSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.