Legal Opinion

Chambliss v. Gorelik

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1971No. 149PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

At common law the owner or keeper of a dog was not liable for the vicious or mischievous acts of the dog unless he had prior knowledge of the vicious or mischievous propensities of the dog or unless the injury was attributable to the negligence of the owner or keeper. Nelson v. Hansen (1960), 10 Wis. 2d 107, 102 N. W. 2d 251. In the instant case the action for common-law negligence was dismissed, because there was no proof of defendant’s knowledge of any vicious or mischievous propensity of the dog, Tipper. Accordingly, the case proceeded, and judgment was rendered only on the liability which…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Nelson v. HansenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Legault v. MalackerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Elliott v. HerzMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Koetting v. ConroyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Schraeder v. KoopmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Smaxwell v. BayardWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Becker v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
  3. Meunier v. OgurekCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
  4. Denil v. CoppersmithCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
  5. Julie A. Augsburger v. Homestead Mutual Insurance CompanyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API