Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Blow

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided July 15, 1890PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Special proceeding instituted against Philomene Chevalier, as administratrix with the will annexed of Lutgarde Blow, by Julia F. Buchanan, as next of kin, and devisee of decedent, consolidated under Code of Civil Procedure, § 2728, with a proceeding instituted by said administratrix for the judicial settlement of the accounts of said administratrix.

1Opinion of the Court

The Surrogate.

Lutgarde Blow died, leaving a last will and testament, which was duly admitted to probate by the Surrogate of Rensselaer county, about the 1st day of June, 1877. Her will is as follows: “First. After the payment of all my just debts and funeral expenses, I do give and bequeath unto all my children the property of which I may die seized, to be divided equally between them when the youngest of my children shall reach the age of twenty-one years, except there shall be deducted from the shares of Philomene and Vitaline Chevalier each the sum of $1,000 on account of their father…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Van Horne v. FondaNew York Court of Chancery · 1821
  2. Mott v. . AckermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  3. People Ex Rel. Peake v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  4. Campbell v. TouseyNew York Supreme Court · 1827
  5. Shumway v. CooperNew York Supreme Court · 1853

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of EngelNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
  2. In re the Estate of MerrillNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  3. In re Goetschius' EstateNew York Surrogate's Court · 1893
  4. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Estate of RobertsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1911
  5. In re the Estate of MountNew York Surrogate's Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API