Wilds v. German Insurance
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from the. Bates Circuit Court. — Hón. James H. Lay, Judge. . (1) The purported abstract of the record filed herein is not a compliance with' the statute, nor with rule 15 of this court, and the appeal ought to be dismissed. R. 8. 1889, sec. 2653; Rules 14, 15 and 18 of this court; Coodsonv. Railroad, 23 Mo. App. 76; Morris v. Colcheb, 18 Mo.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the. Bates Circuit Court. — Hón. James H. Lay, Judge. . (1) The purported abstract of the record filed herein is not a compliance with' the statute, nor with rule 15 of this court, and the appeal ought to be dismissed. R. 8. 1889, sec. 2653; Rules 14, 15 and 18 of this court; Coodsonv. Railroad, 23 Mo. App. 76; Morris v. Colcheb, 18 Mo. App. 693; Brand v. Cannon, 118 Mo. 595; Johnson v. Carrington, 120 Mo. 315. (2) In •equity cases the evidence should be fully stated, which is not done in this case. Rule 14 of this court; Carter v. Holman, 60 Mo. 498-502; Garrett v. Coal Co., Ill…
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL.
Gill, J.
This is a suit in equity, brought to satisfy and cancel a certain deed of trust covering plaintiff’s real estate. After a somewhat lengthy trial, the •court below entered a decree in plaintiff’s favor, and defendant has appealed.
We have before us now a motion by respondent to •dismiss the appeal on the alleged ground that the appellant has failed to file such an abstract of the record as is required by rule 15 of this court. The motion to dismiss the appeal must be overruled. The appellant has filed here a printed document intended as an abstract,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Trimble v. WollmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1895
3Cited by2 opinions
- Vanfrank v. St. Louis, Cape Girardeau & Ft. Smith Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1901
- Ross v. RossMissouri Court of Appeals · 1900