Legal Opinion

Government of the Virgin Islands v. Jacobs

District Court, Virgin Islands

Decided May 15, 1986No. Crim. No. 1984/66PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

This case presents a novel question under recently-enacted Fed. R. Ev. 412: does the confrontation clause extend to a rape defendant the right to impeach the prosecuting witness with instances of past sexual conduct despite Rule 412’s general ban on such evidence? We hold that the accused has a right to cross-examination where the Government first opens the door on this otherwise inadmissible subject matter. We hold further that the failure of the defense lawyer to conduct cross-examination in this case does not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel.

I. FACTS

O…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. Charles Blue BirdCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
  2. State v. GulrudCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
  3. State v. PeiteIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. United States v. John W. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
  5. Barta v. City & County of HonoluluDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API