Legal Opinion

Adnee v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided October 10, 1963No. Docket Nos. 94686, 94687, 94688Published

Partnership, engaged in the real estate subdivision business, had surplus funds as a result of adverse zoning in respect of part of its property, and determined to use such funds in securities speculation. It bought and sold securities and made short sales of securities, for its own account, through a licensed broker. Held, the net loss of $ 114,115.59 which it sustained from all such trading in the year ending March 31, 1959, was a capital loss and not an ordinary loss.

1Opinion of the Court

Harry M. Adnee and Margaret P. Adnee, et al., 1 Petitioners, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent

Adnee v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 94686, 94687, 94688

United States Tax Court

41 T.C. 40; 1963 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 39;

October 10, 1963, Filed

Decisions will be entered for the respondent.

Partnership, engaged in the real estate subdivision business, had surplus funds as a result of adverse zoning in respect of part of its property, and determined to use such funds in securities speculation. It bought and sold securities and made short sales of securities, for its own account, through a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schafer v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Schafer v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
  3. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. BurnettCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  4. Burnett v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1939
  5. Adnee v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API