Legal Opinion

Unicolors, Inc. v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz, Lp

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 29, 2020No. 18-56253PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNICOLORS, INC., a California Nos. 18-56253 Corporation, 18-56548 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:16-cv-02322- AB-SK H&M HENNES & MAURITZ, L.P., a New York limited partnership, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Andre Birotte, Jr., District Judge, Presiding Submitted March 30, 2020 * Pasadena, California Filed May 29, 2020 * The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 2…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Eberhart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Reed Elsevier, Inc. v. MuchnickSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Three Boys Music Corp. v. BoltonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Apple Computer, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Unicolors, Inc. v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz, L. P.Supreme Court of the United States · 2022
  2. Desire, LLC v. Manna Textiles, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  3. Marcus Gray v. Katheryn HudsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  4. Arthur Alfred, II v. the Walt Disney CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  5. Brittney Gobble Photography, LLC v. Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2021

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API