Legal Opinion
Katz v. Katz Realty Co.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided December 12, 1955No. 42078PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMITER, Justice.
The demand of plaintiffs in this action, founded on an express warranty contained in a deed executed by the defendant to them and affecting immovable property known as 2517-19-21 South Broad Street in the City of New Orleans, is for reim-r bursement of $2,961.01 which they expend: ed in curing alleged defects in such property’s title.
Plaintiffs prevailed in the district court; and from the judgment most of the warrantors in the chain of title, made parties to the suit through calls in warranty, have appealed.
The record discloses that one William S. Good, Jr., as owner,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jacobs v. FreyhanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
- Littleton v. PrattSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1855
- Louisiana State Rice Milling Co. v. KaplanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
- Schill v. ChurchillLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
- Veters v. WalshLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
3Cited by5 opinions
- Harville v. CampbellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
- BERWICK MUD COMPANY v. StansburyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
- Guthrie v. Rudy Brown Builders, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
- Rootkin v. GeerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1988
- Fuselier v. ComeauxLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982