Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Stark

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 10, 1936No. 15,128Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion.

Wood, J.,

Dissenting. — I am unable to agree with the result reached in this appeal by a majority of my associates, insofar as it pertains to liability on the bond before the court.

The facts were all stipulated and those necessary for a consideration of the questions presented may be summarized as folows:

Continuously, from January 25, 1929, to the date of the trial of this cause in the lower court, pursuant to an order of the Sullivan Circuit Court, Herschel V. Stark was the duly appointed, qualified and acting receiver of the First State Bank of Shelburn, Indiana. As such…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Board of Com'rs of Woodson CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. PoetkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  3. United States v. NichollSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  4. Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. State ex rel. Leavenworth State BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Wilkinson CountyMississippi Supreme Court · 1915

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API