Legal Opinion

Chubb v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1998No. 96-2511PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.

We are asked to determine whether the state may assert the doctrines of waiver and estoppel in an appeal by a public employee seeking to claim the statutory protection of classified civil service following the termination of employment. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals and hold that, in an appeal pursuant to R.C. 124.34 by a terminated public employee who claims classified status, the state may assert defenses of waiver and estoppel if the employee has accepted appointment to a position designated as unclassified and also has accepted the benefits of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Chavis v. Sycamore City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Yarosh v. BecaneOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Sanitary Commercial Services, Inc. v. ShankOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Andrews v. Ohio State Teachers Retirement System BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State ex rel. Board of County Commissioners v. Board of DirectorsOhio Supreme Court · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Glidden Co. v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State ex rel. Wallace v. State Medical BoardOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Mark-It Place Foods, Inc. v. New Plan Excel Realty Trust, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. State ex rel. Stacy v. Batavia Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State ex rel. Stacy v. Batavia Local School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 2002

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API