The Matter of Jun Wang v. Letitia James
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
State of New York OPINION Court of Appeals This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. No. 88 In the Matter of Jun Wang, Appellant, v. Letitia James, &c., Respondent. Andrew R. Borelli, for appellant. Kevin C. Hu, for respondent. CANNATARO, J.: The issue presented on this appeal is whether petitioner, a physician who rendered professional services to a person incarcerated by the State, was “acting at the request of” the Department of Corrections and Community Supervision (DOCCS) within the meaning -1- -2- No. 88 of Correction Law § 24-a such…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Rocovich v. Consolidated Edison Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Kurcsics v. Merchants Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Morris v. Snappy Car Rental, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.