Legal Opinion

Marsh v. State

New York Court of Claims

Decided January 15, 1921No. Claim No. 14361Published

Claim for damages caused by appropriation of land.

1Opinion of the CourtCunningham, J.

The claimants were the owners of ten and seventy-four one-hundredths acres of land abutting on Mill street in the city of Rome, their title extending to the center line of the street. The state appropriated for Barge Canal' purposes, under the authority of the Barge Canal Act (Laws of 1903, chap. 147), all of Mill street in front of a large part of the. claimants ’ premises. Notice of the appropriation prescribed by the statute was served on the city of Rome; none was served on the claimants. The state destroyed the street, and then located and constructed a new and *778improved Mill street…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Derrick v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API