Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Manuel

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided August 26, 1966No. 19,261Published

1ConcurrenceKilday, Judge

(concurring in the result) :

I concur in the result.

In view of the disagreement between my brothers, I deem it necessary to express my views separately.

There is no dispute between them as to what occurred in the closed hearing; rather, their differences arise over the interpretation placed thereon. We are here dealing with a procedure which is found only in military law, expressly provided for in Article 39, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 839, and for which there are no civilian precedents.

The cited Article provides in pertinent part that “After a general court-martial has finally…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Shields v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. State v. MurphyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  3. United States v. AllbeeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  4. United States v. BerryUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  5. United States v. KeithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API