Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Stennett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 4, 1993PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrew Iii, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 13, 1991, which ruled that claimant was disquali*775fled, from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant was initially determined to be eligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits without any disqualifying conditions. The employer objected, contending that claimant should be disqualified because his employment was terminated due to misconduct. Although the initial determination was sustained due to the employer’s inability to proceed with the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of PadillaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. In re the Claim of ValentinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. In re the Claim of O'ConnorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. In re the Claim of MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of JonassenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. In re the Claim of WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. In re the Claim of SimonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API