State v. Powers
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINZNER, Judge.
Defendant appeals his convictions and sentence, with enhancements, for second degree murder and robbery. Our second and third calendar notices proposed summary affirmance. Defendant has responded with memoranda in opposition and motions to amend the docketing statement. We deny the motions to amend, and we are not persuaded by the memoranda; we therefore affirm.
We first identify the issues originally raised and now abandoned, either expressly or by incorporation into the issues on which amendment of the docketing statement was sought. Next, we discuss the issues…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. RaelNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
- State v. PeppersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
- State v. McCarterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. JacobsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
- State v. TurnerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. WilsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- Duncan v. KerbyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. SwavolaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
- State v. RodriguezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
- State v. WilsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.