Legal Opinion

People v. Davey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 12, 2012PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarry, J.

Defendant claims that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel because he was not advised that he had a viable defense to the charge of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree. Upon review, we agree that his contentions are sufficient to raise questions of fact requiring a hearing (see CPL 440.30 [1]; People v Wimberly, 86 AD3d 651, 652 [2011]; People v Reynolds, 309 AD2d 976, 977 [2003], lv denied 5 NY3d 832 [2005]). Defendant’s conviction arose out of his possession of a Social Security card issued in a name other than his own. He asserts that he had assumed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. BrigginsNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. People v. AsaiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. People v. ThomsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. People v. AsaroNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. People v. ReynoldsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. BeckinghamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. People v. PerryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  3. People v. BeckinghamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  5. People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API