Legal Opinion
Rochester Savings Bank v. Foltz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 9, 1898Published
Actions by the Rochester Savings Bank and the Commercial Bank against Moses Foltz and Beaman Catto.
1Opinion of the Court
No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs. Order appointing receiver affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements in one case. See 54 N. Y. Supp. 764.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Commercial Bank v. FoltzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898