Legal Opinion

Ophir v. City of Boston

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided August 14, 2009No. Civil Action 09-10467-WGYPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WILLIAM G. YOUNG, District Judge.

My ten year old grandson came to watch the motion session where this matter was argued. When it was over, he said, ‘Why can’t Boston do what it wants with its taxis? It’s for the environment.”

Why indeed?

The answer, Cam, is that the Congress of the United States, pursuing national goals it considers important, has forbidden Boston from taking this initiative on behalf of its citizens. 1

1. INTRODUCTION

“A hallmark of environmental federalism is that neither federal nor state governments limit themselves to what many legal scholars have deemed…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API