Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Quinlan

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 27, 1978No. 1584PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH, Judge:

Appellant was convicted of simple assault, terroristic threats, crimes committed with a firearm, and criminal conspiracy. 1 One of appellant’s contentions is that he was not brought to trial within 180 days as required by Rule 1100 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Criminal Procedure. Pa.R. Crim.P. 1100(a)(2). 2 We agree and shall therefore order appellant discharged. 3

The complaint was filed on August 12, 1975. Trial was scheduled for January 14, 1976. On January 14 defense counsel requested a continuance to January 19, which was granted. On January 16 defense counsel filed a motion…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SheltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Commonwealth v. O'SheaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Commonwealth v. RichbourghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Commonwealth v. McQuaidSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Commonwealth v. HaynesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. CadenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Commonwealth v. WhitnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Commonwealth v. FisherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Commonwealth v. FisherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API