Legal Opinion

Pizarro v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 23, 1981No. 80-1174Published

1Opinion of the Court

BERANEK, Judge.

Defendant appeals from two concurrent thirty-year sentences for burglary and attempted sexual battery imposed after remand from this court for resentencing in State v. Pizarro, 383 So.2d 762 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). We affirm.

At the original sentencing, the judge ruled over the State’s objection that the sentencing provisions of the Youthful Offender Act, Section 958.05, Florida Statutes (1979), were mandatory since defendant met the criteria under Section 958.04(2), Florida Statutes (1979).1 The trial court *1365sentenced defendant to the maximum under the Act, six years — four years…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. United States v. BenzSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. United States v. Eugene Difrancesco, United States of America v. Eugene DifrancescoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API