Legal Opinion

Burgin v. Forbes

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided March 2, 1948PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Ratliff

Affirming.

The appellant Frank Burgin and appellee Ernest Davis own adjoining land in Madison county, Kentucky. Appellee Forbes is the tenant of Ms coappellee, Davis, and has the possession and beneficial use of the. Davis land. In January, 1939, appellees, as plaintiffs below, brought this action in the .Madison circuit court against appellant pursuant to section 1780, Carroll’s Kentucky Statutes, now section 256.010, KRS, and other related sections of the statutes pertaining to division fences between adjoining land owners, seeking a mandatory injunction…

2Cited by23 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Trent v. SimsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. State v. LOUISIANA RIVERBOAT GAMING COM'N & HORSESHOE ENTERT.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
  3. Filson v. Windsor Court HotelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
  4. Cornelison v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Metropolitan Development Commission v. Villages, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1984

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API