Legal Opinion

Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Interstate Commerce Commission

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 28, 1982No. Nos. 79-1580, 81-2570PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

GIBBONS, Circuit Judge.

Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) petitions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2342 and 2321 to set aside an order of the Rail Service Planning Office of the Interstate Commerce Commission (RSPO) promulgating a Standard for Determining Commuter Rail Service Continuation Subsidies which makes SEPTA responsible for costs resulting from commuter rail accidents occurring while such service is provided by Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail). We deny SEPTA’s petition for review.

This is the third occasion upon which SEPTA has attempted to…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Interstate Commerce Commission, Rail Services Planning Office, Consolidated Rail Corporation, Intervenor. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Interstate Commerce Commission, Rail Services Planning OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API