Legal Opinion

Morrison v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 14, 1907PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Bessemer City Court. Heard before Hon. William Jackson. From a conviction for trespass after warning, E. G. Morrison appeals.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Bessemer City Court. Heard before Hon. William Jackson. From a conviction for trespass after warning, E. G. Morrison appeals. Tbe facts are sufficient stated in the opinion. —The motion of defendant to quash the complaint was properly overruled and the amendment properly allowed. — Wright v. The State, 136 Ala. 139; Holland v. The State, 139 Ala. 120. The request for the charges were in bulk and were properly refused unless all were good. — Andre'ws v. The State, 43 South. 192; Verb erg v. The State, 137 Ala. 73.

1Opinion of the CourtDenson, J.

Section 5606 of the Code of 1896 pro-' vides that “any person, who, without legal cause or good excuse, enters into the dwelling house, or on the premises of another, after having been warned, within six months preceding, not to do so; or any person who, having entered into the dwelling house or on the premises of another without having been warned within six months not to do so, and fails or refuses, without legal cause or good excuse, to immediately leave on being ordered or requested to do so by the person in possession, his agent or representative, must on conviction,” etc. The affidavit…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Holland v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1903

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Law v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  2. Moss v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API