Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Streshly
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND
LARRY ALAN BURNS, District Judge.
“Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you’ll land among the stars.” So the banal saying goes, and while it may be a laudable approach to life, it’s an ill-advised strategy for obtaining a sizable judgment in this Court. Plaintiff asks for a default judgment to be entered in its favor for $100,875. That amount is manifestly excessive under existing law — and Plaintiff probably knows it. Plaintiffs motion for default judgment is therefore DENIED, but without prejudice and with leave to amend.
I.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Time Warner Cable of New York City v. Googies Luncheonette, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Lau Ah Yew v. John Foster Dulles, Secretary of State of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. GarciaDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2008
- Kingvision Pay-Per-View, Ltd. v. BackmanDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2000
3Cited by8 opinions
- Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. YakubetsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Furia v. HirschDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. VelasquezDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- G&G Closed Circuit Events LLC v. Mezcales Grill LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020
- Joe Hand Promotions Incorporated v. EAA American MX LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.