Chad Folkening, DSL.Com, Inc. and eCorp v. Megan Van Petten n/k/a Megan Van Petten Walton

I respectfully disagree with the majority’s reasoning to affirm the trial court’s “conclusion that the ten-year limitation period of Indiana Code [sjection 34-11-2-11 applies” rather than the six-year statute of limitation of I.C. § 34-11-2-9, which is imposed on written, contracts for the payment of money. Op. p. 822.

Statutes of limitation seek to provide security against stale claims, which in turn promotes judicial efficiency and advances the peace and welfare of society. Imbody v. Fifth Third Bank, 12 N.E.3d 943, 945 (Ind.Ct.App.2014). When determining the applicable statute of…