Legal Opinion · Dissent

Vlahos v. Sentry Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 5, 1992No. A91A1573Published

1DissentMcMurray, Presiding Judge

I respectfully dissent. It is my view that the undisputed evidence requires a finding that Angie Vlahos is entitled to lost income benefits under OCGA § 33-34-4 (a) (2) (B).

“To recover benefits for ‘loss of income or earnings during disability’ pursuant to OCGA § 33-34-4 (a) (2) (B), an insured is required merely to establish with ‘reasonable certainty’ the fact and amount of such lost income or earnings, and this he may accomplish either by showing that he previously had accepted an offer of income-generating employment for the period in question or by showing ‘a continuous pattern of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Leonard v. Preferred Risk Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  2. Midland Insurance v. WestCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  3. Allison v. AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANYSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  4. Insurance Company of North America v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  5. SOUTHEASTERN FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API