Legal Opinion

Milton Ventura v. Hoyt C. Cupp, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 12, 1983No. 81-3598PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from the denial of a petition for habeas corpus. It nicely illustrates certain difficulties with the exhaustion of state remedies requirement.

Federal law requires exhaustion of all state remedies. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)-(c) (1976); Rose v. Lundy, 455 U.S. 509, 102 S.Ct. 1198, 1201-02, 71 L.Ed.2d 379 (1982). Remedies that appear not to have been exhausted, such as the appeal of a conviction to the state’s highest court, see Cartwright v. Cupp, 650 F.2d 1103, 1104 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1023, 102 S.Ct. 1722, 72 L.Ed.2d 142 (1982), may in fact not have been…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. William Junior Hughes v. Idaho State Board of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Ozzie Batchelor v. Hoyt C. Cupp, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, James Redden, Solicitor General, Walter L. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  3. Prado McGee Jr. v. W.J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  4. Johnstone v. WolffDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1984
  5. Joseph Wilson v. Charles C. FotiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API