Legal Opinion

Wood v. Bartholomew

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 10, 1995No. 94-1419PublishedCited by 306 opinions

1Per curiam

The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed the District Court’s denial of habeas relief based on its speculation that the prosecution’s failure to turn over the results of a polygraph examination of a key witness might have had an adverse effect on pretrial preparation by the defense. The Court of Appeals assumed, and the parties do not dispute, that the results were inadmissible under state law both for substantive purposes as well as for impeachment. The decision below is a misapplication of our Brady jurisprudence, see Brady v. Maryland, 373 U. S. 83 (1963), and we accordingly…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. State v. BartholomewWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. EllisonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by306 opinions

  1. Calderon v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Commonwealth v. SpotzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Aldrich v. BockDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
  4. Wright v. HopperCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. Linette Perez, United States of America v. Juancho Alcantera, United States of America v. Edmundo BatoonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002

301 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API