Legal Opinion

Gales-Rojac Corp. v. Pennsylvania Railroad

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided January 26, 1956PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The entire case rests on documentary evidence which conclusively indicates that plaintiff failed to make out any case for compensation or commissions. The railroad’s proposition was for a bid direct from plaintiff as an advertising sales dealer. Instead plaintiff responded with a suggestion for a deal whereby the advertiser would contract directly with the railroad, the latter to pay plaintiff a commission. No possible claim arises from a counter-proposal for an entirely new arrangement which is rejected by the offeror. Plaintiff’s suggestion did not even reach the status of a counter-offer,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gambino v. John Lucas & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  2. Storms v. City of FultonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  3. Goldman v. SwartwoutAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  4. Atkinson v. SandersNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. Fox v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lewis v. Wise Shops, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API