Gales-Rojac Corp. v. Pennsylvania Railroad
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
1Per curiam
The entire case rests on documentary evidence which conclusively indicates that plaintiff failed to make out any case for compensation or commissions. The railroad’s proposition was for a bid direct from plaintiff as an advertising sales dealer. Instead plaintiff responded with a suggestion for a deal whereby the advertiser would contract directly with the railroad, the latter to pay plaintiff a commission. No possible claim arises from a counter-proposal for an entirely new arrangement which is rejected by the offeror. Plaintiff’s suggestion did not even reach the status of a counter-offer,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gambino v. John Lucas & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
- Storms v. City of FultonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
- Goldman v. SwartwoutAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- Atkinson v. SandersNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Fox v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lewis v. Wise Shops, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1957