Legal Opinion

National Bank of Commerce v. May

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 14, 1979No. 5243PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DICKENSON, Justice.

The first question is which innocent party must bear the loss where a valid deed was fraudulently altered by changing the property description after its execution and delivery, but prior to recordation. The next question is the effect of a deed back to one of the two defrauded grantors which recited that it was “subject to” a lien which would otherwise have been invalid as to the property interest which is in dispute. The last major question is whether punitive damages can be recovered from one of the defendants when no actual damages or other relief was adjudged against…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. International Bankers Life Insurance Co. v. HollowayTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Fort Worth Elevators Co. v. RussellTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  3. J. P. Wooten Motor Co. v. First Bank of SwensonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  4. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. ClarkTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Kunkel v. KunkelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Mack v. NewtonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  2. Dotlich v. DotlichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Durkay v. Madco Oil Co., Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1993
  4. TCA Building Co. v. Northwestern Resources Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1996
  5. Gaynier v. Ginsberg, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API