Legal Opinion

Peltason, Tenenbaum & Harris, Inc. v. Refunding Board

District Court, W.D. Arkansas

Decided December 17, 1935No. 2758Published

1Opinion of the Court

WOODROUGH, Circuit Judge.

This suit was brought by the holder of Arkansas road district refunding bonds, series B, to enjoin the execution of an order of the refunding board of the state of Arkansas, which order would cause all the moneys in the state highway fund to be applied to the purchase of bonds in series A, leaving none for the purchase of plaintiff’s bonds; and to compel the application of a part of the money in the fund to the purchase of plaintiff’s B bonds. Other holders of B bonds, in the same situation as plaintiff have intervened, praying similarly as to the B bonds which they…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dawson v. Kentucky Distilleries & Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Board of Liquidation v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Cargile v. New York Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  5. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. HiltonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API