Holcomb v. Bowe
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hart, J.,
(after stating the facts). The court found that, although the deed was absolute in form, it was intended as a mortgage. The deed was treated by the court as a mortgage, and a foreclosure thereof was granted for the balance due.
The undisputed evidence shows that Mary Holcomb owed M. H. Pemberton $1,150, the balance due on a mortgage which she had executed to him on the property. The mortgage indebtedness bore interest at the rate of ten per 'sent, per annum.
In the present case, judgment was rendered in favor of Bowe against Mary Holcomb for the balance due on the mortgage…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rodman v. SandersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1884
- Hudson v. Union & Mercantile Trust Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
- Bryan v. HobbsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
3Cited by4 opinions
- Loveless v. DiehlSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
- Zini v. First Natl. Bank in Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
- Loveless v. DiehlSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
- Williams v. GerardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940