Legal Opinion

Holcomb v. Bowe

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 10, 1922PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, J.,

(after stating the facts). The court found that, although the deed was absolute in form, it was intended as a mortgage. The deed was treated by the court as a mortgage, and a foreclosure thereof was granted for the balance due.

The undisputed evidence shows that Mary Holcomb owed M. H. Pemberton $1,150, the balance due on a mortgage which she had executed to him on the property. The mortgage indebtedness bore interest at the rate of ten per 'sent, per annum.

In the present case, judgment was rendered in favor of Bowe against Mary Holcomb for the balance due on the mortgage…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rodman v. SandersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1884
  2. Hudson v. Union & Mercantile Trust Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  3. Bryan v. HobbsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Loveless v. DiehlSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  2. Zini v. First Natl. Bank in Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  3. Loveless v. DiehlSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  4. Williams v. GerardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API