Legal Opinion

United States v. Wolfson

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided April 19, 1971No. Crim. A. No. 1909PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

LATCHUM, District Judge.

In this multi-defendant criminal action, the defendant, Edward Fishbein, at the time set for sentencing, moved pursuant to Rule 32(d), F.R.Crim.P., before sentence was imposed, to withdraw his plea of nolo contendere to Count 2 of the indictment.

The facts relevant to the defendant’s motion may be summarized as follows: On June 7, 1968, the Grand Jury returned a twenty-nine count indictment against Nathan Wolfson, William F. Emmons, Albert Frost, James B. Thompson and Edward Fishbein. Count 1 charged all of the defendants, under 18 U.S.C. § 371, with a…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Sullivan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. United States v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. CroweTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. GodekSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  3. United States v. KatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Miller v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  5. United States v. Lawrence Prince, Screenco, Inc., Climatrol Corporation and Emery Findley, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API