Legal Opinion

Trayanoff v. Oak Island Land Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 10, 2004No. 2003-CA-1425PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

|,MAX N. TOBIAS, JR., Judge.

The plaintiff/appellant, Chris Trayanoff (“Trayanoff’), appeals the judgment of the trial court in favor of the defendants, Donald A. Pellissier (“Pellissier”), Robert J. Laporte (“Laporte”), Donna Maitre (“Mai-tre”), and the corporation of which they were officers, Oak Island Land Co., Inc. (“Oak Island”). Trayanoff alleged that the defendants defrauded him in a land investment scheme.1

Trayanoff and Pellissier met in 1974, when Trayanoff began providing coffee service to Pellissier’s radiator shops. Trayanoff was, at that time, a route salesman of chips, coffee,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  2. Mart v. HillSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  3. Plaquemines Par. Com'n Council v. Delta Dev. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  4. Riggins v. Dixie Shoring Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
  5. Noe v. RousselSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gremillion v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
  2. Ernest R. Gremillion, Jr. v. Kansas City Southern Railway CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API