Yennock v. State
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and facts, without costs of these appeals to either party, and a new trial granted. Memorandum: The decision does not disclose the basis of the court’s determination. That alone could require reversal and a new trial. (Conklin v. State of New York, 22 A D 2d 481.) In addition there are serious errors and deficiencies in the proof offered by both sides which, in our opinion, render impossible any decision by this court based upon this record. The real estate experts who testified for both sides all agreed that this tract contained three segments of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Duggan v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1962
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mastan Company v. WeilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- 2641 Concourse Co. v. City University of New YorkNew York Court of Claims · 1987