Legal Opinion
State v. Andrew O.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 5, 2011PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and a new trial ordered.
On August 15, 2007, the Attorney General filed a petition in Supreme Court against Andrew O., a detained sex offender, seeking his civil management pursuant to article 10 of the Mental Hygiene Law (see Mental Hygiene Law § 10.03 [g]; § 10.06 [a]). Supreme Court subsequently found probable cause to believe that Andrew O. was a sex offender requiring civil management (see Mental Hygiene Law § 10.06 [g], [k]; § 10.03 [q]). At the ensuing jury trial, Andrew O.’s expert—his…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. WoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- State v. Andrew O.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. Floyd Y.New York Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. Shannon S.New York Court of Appeals · 2012
- Matter of State of New York v. Ian I.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. DemagallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- State v. Andrew D.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.