United States v. Vasilaky
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Circuit Judge.
1. We think the evidence sufficient to sustain the verdict. In particular, there was testimony that the United States owned all material aboard the vessel, including that in the store-room. There was also evidence from which the jury could reasonably infer (1) that the goods in question were taken from the store-room and constituted part of the ship’s supplies, and (2) that appellant wilfully and knowingly stole some of those supplies.
2. Appellant, whose triad counsel stated, at the end of the judge’s charge, that “there is no exception or request to charge,” now…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. MonroeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Vicente Carrodeguas, Guillermo Hernandez-Cartaya, Francisco J. FernandezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Sam Hoover v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- United States v. Horace Rinaldi and Ralph CarboneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- United States v. KirbyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- People v. Alsina RiveraSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.