Legal Opinion
Smith v. Wells Fargo Credit Corp.
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided May 12, 1989No. CIV 88-541 PHX PGRPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROSENBLATT, District Judge.
Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and plaintiffs’ cross-motion for partial summary judgment are pending before the Court. After consideration of the entire record and the oral argument of counsel, the Court finds that the plaintiffs’ partial summary judgment motion should be granted because the Court concludes that the plaintiffs have the right to rescind and that res judicata does not bar this action.
The dispute in this lawsuit concerns an alleged statutory right to rescission pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Sec. 1635, a provision of the Truth in Lending Act…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson Bros. Ford v. ValenciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- James Piatt v. Ellis MacDougallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Olga Valencia and Miguel Gonzalez v. Anderson Bros. Ford and Ford Motor Credit CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Esther Charles v. Krauss Company, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Roberts v. National School of Radio & Television BroadcastingDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1974
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wells Fargo Credit Corp. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- Eastern Savings Bank, FSB v. Esteban.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2013
- Steinbrecher v. Mid-Penn Consumer Discount Co. (In Re Steinbrecher)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- Woolaghan v. United Mortgage Services, Inc. (In Re Woolaghan)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- Warren Y.S.C. Albano Caroline C.S. Albano,plaintiffs-Appellants v. Norwest Financial Hawaii, Inc.,defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.