Legal Opinion

Van Cleef & Arpels Logistics, S.A. v. Landau Jewelry

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 4, 2008No. 07 Civ. 564(SAS)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND

On April 18, 2008, this Court issued an Opinion and Order granting plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment concerning the validity of their copyright in the “Vintage Alhambra” design (“the Design”) and denying defendants’ cross-motion on the same issue. 1 Defendants now seek reconsideration of both motions. I previously held that the plaintiffs (collectively “Van Cleef’) hold a valid United States copyright over the Design, based on the long-held French copyright. 2 Defendants now assert that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bruce C. Shrader v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  2. Carolco Pictures Inc. v. SirotaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
  3. In Re: Bdc 56 Llc, Debtor. Key Mechanical Inc. v. Bdc 56 Llc, Dwf Inc., Mesta Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  4. National Comics Publications, Inc. v. Fawcett Publications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  5. Houbigant, Inc. v. ACB Mercantile, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stern v. LavenderDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  2. Santa Fe Goldworks, Inc. v. Bella Jewelry, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API