Legal Opinion

Henry Quentzel Plumbing Supply Co. v. 60 Pineapple Residence Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1984PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Michael C. Curci, J.

Plaintiff, Henry Quentzel Plumbing Supply Co., Inc., hereinafter Quentzel, is bringing this action essentially for a money judgment to enforce a mechanic’s lien filed against the defendant, the filing date of such lien being March 15, 1982.

The defendant, in its answer and memorandum, moves to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211, 3212 for the failure to state a cause of action and for failure to join necessary parties defendant. Defendant argues that there are other senior liens filed and outstanding against this same property.

Furthermore, the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mellen v. Athens Hotel Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  2. Bryant Equipment Corp. v. A-1 Moore Contracting Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  3. Fellner v. McMurrayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  4. D. M. I. Painting, Inc. v. Eastern Long Island HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dynamic Systems, Inc. v. Skanska USA Building, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2021
  2. Inland Empire Dry Wall Supply Co. v. Western Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  3. Inland Empire Dry Wall Supply Co. v. Western Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API