Winston Churchill Henry v. Paul J. Madigan, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Alcatraz, California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Chief Judge.
Henry appeals from a decision in a habeas corpus proceeding in which the District Court for the Northern District of California held that the appellee Warden was entitled to imprison Henry on a sentence rendered in May, 1951, by the District Court for the District of Hawaii for conspiracy to import narcotics, the sentence being first stated “to run consecutively with any sentences [plural] that are pending against you”, later stated in the entered judgment as “a period of two years to run consecutively with any sentences [plural] now serving.”
At the time of the above…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Affronti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- United States v. DaughertySupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Kirk v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Daugherty v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- Mills v. Hunter, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. William Howard DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1962
- Albert Edward Deutschmann v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- Leaman Russell Smith v. F. T. Wilkinson, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Atlanta, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- Shultz v. SiglerNebraska Supreme Court · 1965