Legal Opinion

Winston Churchill Henry v. Paul J. Madigan, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Alcatraz, California

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 20, 1957No. 15353_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENMAN, Chief Judge.

Henry appeals from a decision in a habeas corpus proceeding in which the District Court for the Northern District of California held that the appellee Warden was entitled to imprison Henry on a sentence rendered in May, 1951, by the District Court for the District of Hawaii for conspiracy to import narcotics, the sentence being first stated “to run consecutively with any sentences [plural] that are pending against you”, later stated in the entered judgment as “a period of two years to run consecutively with any sentences [plural] now serving.”

At the time of the above…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Affronti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. United States v. DaughertySupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Kirk v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  4. Daugherty v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  5. Mills v. Hunter, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. William Howard DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1962
  2. Albert Edward Deutschmann v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
  3. Leaman Russell Smith v. F. T. Wilkinson, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Atlanta, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
  4. Shultz v. SiglerNebraska Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API