United States v. Sanchez

EVERETT, Senior Judge,

with whom GIERKE, Judge, joins (concurring in the result):

In my view, this case — appellant’s story, as well as his theory of defense and how appellant believed that the proffered evidence might have supported that theory — is somewhat more complicated and subtle than the lead opinion reflects. Accordingly, I write separately in order to briefly develop these matters and, at the same time, to explain how I believe that appellant’s proffer fell short of the mark to constitutionally compel admission of the contested evidence.

Appellant’s version of events was succinctly…