Broder v. Trans-Atlantic Novelty Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal from a judgment of the City Court of the city- of New York in favor of the defendant, entered upon the dismissal of the complaint at the close of plaintiff’s case, upon the ground that plaintiff had not proved a cause of action.
1Opinion of the CourtWhitaker, J.
On January 14, 1915, plaintiff and defendant entered into the following agreement which was to begin December 31, 1914, and continue for one year until December 31, 1915:
‘ ‘ This agreement, made the 18th day of May, in the year one thousand nine hundred and fourteen, between Trans-Atlantic Novelty Co., Inc., a corporation duly organized and existing under.and by virtue *201of the laws of the State of New York, party of the first part, and Jacques Broder, of number 68 Lenox Avenue, Borough of Manhattan, City and State of New York, party of the second part,
“ Witnesseth:
“ First. That the party of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Laird v. . CartonNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Gifford v. . WatersNew York Court of Appeals · 1876