Legal Opinion
Utica First Insurance v. Arken, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 16, 2005PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action for a judgment declaring that the plaintiff is not obligated to defend or indemnify the defendant Arken, Inc., in an underlying action entitled Furtado v C&M Holding Corp., pending in the Supreme Court, Kings County, under index No. 49192/99, the defendants C&M Holding Corporation and Town Sports International, Inc., appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Douglass, J.), dated January 22, 2004, which granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and denied their cross motion for summary judgment.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs, and the matter…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lanza v. WagnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
- Thrasher v. United States Liability InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. ImeriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance v. BresilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
3Cited by11 opinions
- Country-Wide Insurance v. HendersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Matter of Government Empls. Ins. Co. v. FletcherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- DeLuca v. RLI Insurance Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Preferred Mutual Insurance v. Sav Carpentry, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Continental Casualty Co. v. StradfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.