Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hawkins v. Hawkins

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 14, 1997No. S97A0869Published

1DissentCarley, Justice

In my opinion, Georgia law does not authorize the trial court to require the payment of periodic alimony beyond the death of Mr. Hawkins, by ordering that he maintain a life insurance policy for the benefit of Ms. Hawkins. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent.

Contrary to the majority opinion, neither Ritchea v. Ritchea, 244 Ga. 476 (260 SE2d 871) (1979) nor Andrews v. Whitaker, 265 Ga. 76 (453 SE2d 735) (1995) supports the proposition “that a trial court may order a spouse to carry life insurance for the benefit of the other spouse.” (Majority opinion, p. 638.) Ritchea, supra at 477 (2),…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sapp v. SappSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
  2. Andrews v. WhitakerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  3. Ritchea v. RitcheaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  4. Gardner v. GardnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  5. Winstead v. WinsteadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API