Smock v. Henderson
Indiana Superior Court
1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.
The complaint in this case contained five paragraphs. To the first, and third paragraphs demurrers were sustáined, and these need not now be considered.
The second paragraph is, in substance, as follows: That the Water Works Company is a corporation, duly organized *243¡under the laws of Indiana; the amount ©f stock subscribed was only six- hundred dollars, no part of which has ever been paid, and no-certificates of stock were 'ever issued therefor; that in dune, 1870, the defendants were directors of said corporation, and as such directors, in violation of their legal ■duty, and without any…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- MINOR v. the Mechanics Bank of AlexandriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Bissell v. Michigan Southern & Northern Indiana Railroad CompaniesNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Wood v. WoodNew York Court of Chancery · 1836
- Gifford v. CarvillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Cazeaux v. MaliNew York Supreme Court · 1857
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gibblehouse v. StongSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1832
- Brown v. . McKeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
- Morse v. WoodsSuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1830
- Chevalier v. RuskTexas Supreme Court · 1843
- Anderson v. SempleIllinois Supreme Court · 1845
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.