Kinkade v. Howard
South Dakota Supreme Court
. : Appeal from-Minnehaha county court; Hon. Dana R, Bailey, County .Judge. • Action by-R.-E.-Kinkade. against C. K. Howard. Prom a-judgment-'for defendant, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtPuller, J.
This appeal is from la .judgment-in favor -of the defendant, and an order overruling a motion for a new trial, -in an- action- based upon, the following instrument: “500.00. .Sioux Falls, S,’D., February 28, 1900.. One year after date I promise to, pay to L. E. Kinkade Five Hundred Doblare at her office, value received, with interest at- no per cent., per annum from date until paid. This note not negotiable. C> K. Howard.” If the deposition of respondent was properly admitted in -evidence, the following allegations of- the answer stand proved, and their sufficiency as a defense is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Borders v. BarberSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
- Western Twine Co. v. WrightSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899
- Mills v. DunlapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1853
- Sleep v. HeymannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
- Osgood v. SutherlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Koester v. Northwestern Port Huron Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1910