Legal Opinion · Dissent

Matter of Huff

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 5, 1991No. 00195Published

1DissentBeck, Judge

On June 2, 1987, 17 year old appellant Jelbert Huff, Jr., stood trial and was convicted of reckless driving and driving at an unsafe speed. Today this court concludes that, because of perceived statutory limitations on the courts in which he was and will be tried, appellant can be tried once again for the same offense. In my view, the majority’s holding is an unwarranted violation of appellant’s fundamental guarantee against double jeopardy. I respectfully dissent.

The constitutional guarantee respecting double jeopardy embodies three protections: “It protects against a second prosecution for…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API