Legal Opinion

Chandra Tate, et al. v. Eyemed Vision Care, LLC

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided September 18, 2026No. 1:21-cv-00036Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION CHANDRA TATE, et al. Plaintiffs, Case No. 1:21-cv-36 v. JUDGE DOUGLAS R. COLE EYEMED VISION CARE, LLC Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER The named plaintiffs in this class action move the Court to grant final approval of their proposed settlement. (Doc. 50). Separately, they move for attorney’s fees, litigation expenses, service awards, and settlement administration expenses. (Doc. 49 (fees, expenses, and service awards); Doc. 50, #917–18 (administration expenses)). For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API