Chandra Tate, et al. v. Eyemed Vision Care, LLC
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION CHANDRA TATE, et al. Plaintiffs, Case No. 1:21-cv-36 v. JUDGE DOUGLAS R. COLE EYEMED VISION CARE, LLC Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER The named plaintiffs in this class action move the Court to grant final approval of their proposed settlement. (Doc. 50). Separately, they move for attorney’s fees, litigation expenses, service awards, and settlement administration expenses. (Doc. 49 (fees, expenses, and service awards); Doc. 50, #917–18 (administration expenses)). For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.